DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Halacha is iTorah
 

Dedicated By
Anonymous

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
      
(File size: 6.25 MB)
Performing a Berit Mila on Shabbat on a Child Whose Father is Not Jewish

The Rishonim (Medieval Halachic scholars) debate the question as to the status of a child produced by a Jewish mother and non-Jewish father. The Gemara in Masechet Yebamot (17) implies that according to the view of Rabina, a child’s status in such a case is determined by the mother’s status, but Tosafot in Masechet Kiddushin (75b) cites sources indicating that Rabina’s view is disputed. Different opinions exist among the Rishonim, but the Shulhan Aruch (Eben Ha’ezer 43) indicates that the status of such a child is determined based on the mother’s status. This is, of course, the accepted view. Therefore, the child of a Jewish woman is considered a Jew for all Halachic purposes, even if the father is not Jewish.

However, an interesting question arises in the case of a boy born on Shabbat to a Jewish mother and a non-Jewish father. Generally, when a boy is born on Shabbat, the Berit Mila is performed the following week on Shabbat. Although normally the infliction of a wound constitutes an act of Shabbat desecration, the Misva to circumcise a child on his eighth day overrides this prohibition. Rabbi Akiva Eiger (1761-1837) ruled (in Yoreh De’a, 255) that in the case of a child with a Jewish mother and non-Jewish father, the Berit Mila should not be performed on Shabbat. As mentioned, this child’s status is subject to a debate among the Rishonim, and although we follow the position that he is to be regarded as a Jew, Rabbi Akiva Eiger maintains that we must take into account the view that this child is not Jewish. And according to this view, circumcising the child on Shabbat is strictly forbidden, since there is obviously no Misva to circumcise non-Jewish children, and thus this Berit Mila does not override the Torah prohibition against inflicting a wound on Shabbat. Rabbi Akiva Eiger therefore asserted that in deference to this view among the Rishonim, the Berit Mila of such a child should be delayed until Sunday.

This view was also followed by the Maharam Shick (1807-1879), who reached this conclusion from a different angle. He notes that in an ordinary case of a baby boy born on Shabbat, when Shabbat starts the next Friday night, the infant has a "Hezkat Issur" – a de facto status of being forbidden for circumcision. Since Berit Mila may not be performed at night, the infant enters Shabbat on Friday night with a de facto presumption that circumcision is forbidden that Shabbat. The next morning, however, the Biblical requirement to circumcise on the eighth day changes this presumed status and makes circumcision permissible. In the case of a boy fathered by a gentile, however, the "Mi’ut" – the minority position among the Halachic authorities which considers this child a non-Jew – joins together with the initial "Hezkat Issur" to prevent the circumcision from becoming permissible. Therefore, the Berit must be delayed until Sunday.

This is also the view of Rav Yehonatan Eibshitz (1690-1764), in his work Ye’arot Debash (Derasha 1).

Others, however, disagree. Rav Eliyahu Halevi Shama (d. 1814), one of the great Rabbis of Aleppo, composed a colossal work on the laws of Berit Mila entitled "Machshireh Mila," which has become the official handbook, so-to-speak, for Sefaradim with respect to all laws and customs related to Berit Mila. In this work, he notes the Shulhan Aruch’s ruling that the newborn son of a Mumar – a Jew who abandoned the Jewish faith, Heaven forbid – who is born on Shabbat is given a Berit Mila the next Shabbat just like any other Jewish child. Rav Eliyahu Shama comments in this context that this applies as well to a Jewish child whose father is not Jewish – in direct contradistinction to the view cited above.

In practice, then, it would certainly be acceptable for Sefaradim to follow this ruling of the "Machshireh Mila" and perform the Berit on Shabbat in this case. It goes without saying, however, that given the different views that exist and the gravity of this issue, a competent Halachic authority should be consulted for guidance.

Summary: Although the child of a Jewish mother and non-Jewish father is considered Jewish in all respects, there is some question as to whether such a child who is born on Shabbat should be circumcised the next Shabbat, as an ordinary Jewish child would. It appears that Sephardic custom allows circumcising the child on Shabbat in such a case, though one should consult with a competent Halachic authority for guidance in this regard.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
If the Hazan Forgot to Recite Ya’aleh Ve’yabo During the Repetition of the Amida on Rosh Hodesh
Should Two Kaddishim be Recited if a Shiur is Given Immediately Before Arbit?
Reciting “Yiheyu Le’rason Imreh Fi” at the End of the Amida
The Kaddish Before Baruch She’amar
The Value of Praying “Vatikin” and Studying Torah Before Prayer
The Importance and Significance of Birkat Ha’lebana
The Custom Among Syrian Jews Regarding the Text of “Ve’la’minim” and Other Portions of the Amida
Adding Prayers for Forgiveness and for One’s Livelihood in “Shema Kolenu”
If One Mistakenly Recited “Morid Ha’tal” Instead of “Mashib Ha’ru’ah U’morid Ha’geshem”
Should a Mourner be Called for an Aliya if He is the Only Kohen in Attendance?
May Birkat Kohanim be Recited if a Non-Jew is Present
If a Kohen Was Mistakenly Called for the Second Aliya; Calling Kohanim for Later Aliyot
How Should the Aliyot be Arranged in a Minyan of Only Kohanim, or if There is Only One Yisrael?
Birkat Kohanim – The Hazan’s Announcement of “Kohanim”; If There is One Kohen or No Kohanim Present
Birkat Kohanim in a Place Without a Sefer Torah; One Who Enters the Synagogue During Birkat Kohanim; Reciting Birkat Kohanim Several Times in One Day
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found