DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 1002 KB)
Can A Teacher Punish and Can A Teacher Demand Of Their Students To Divulge A Culprit

Rabbi Moshe Feinstein (Russia-New York, 1895-1986) was asked a number of questions concerning the limits of disciplinary measures that a teacher may use in a classroom:

1) The first question is whether or not a teacher may punish students for misconduct. Rabbi Feinstein rules that a teacher is certainly entitled to punish a student, and he notes that the Gemara already sanctions punishing students provided that it is not done out of anger and frustration, but strictly for the purpose of educating the student towards proper behavior. Rabbi Feinstein adds that a teacher must also ascertain the student's guilt beyond a shadow of doubt before punishing him. Just as the Beit Din (Rabbinical court) does not administer punishment on the basis of speculation or hearsay, but rather on the basis of clear evidence, so may a teacher punish a student only once he has ascertained that this student indeed committed the act of which he is suspected.

2) Secondly, Rabbi Feinstein was asked whether a teacher may ask students in the class to inform him which student committed a certain act of mischief, whether this is an acceptable means of finding the guilty student. Rabbi Feinstein does not forbid this practice on Halachic grounds, but writes that it is "Mecho'ar" – a distasteful thing to do, as it trains the children to speak Lashon Ha'ra (negative speech about other people). Although the Gemara in Arachin tells that as a student Rabbi Yochanan would bring negative reports to the teacher about Rabbi Akiva, Rabbi Yochanan did so of his own volition in a sincere effort to help Rabbi Akiva improve. This does not mean that a teacher should solicit negative information about students from other students.

3) Finally, may a teacher administer a punishment that causes Bittul Torah (lost time from Torah study), such as suspending him from class? Rabbi Feinstein rules that a teacher must not resort to such measures, because the damage caused by Bittul Torah far outweighs any benefit yielded by this punishment.

Summary: A teacher is allowed to punish a student for misconduct, provided that he does so with a clear head, rather than out of anger and frustration, and that he has ascertained the student's guilt. He should not administer a punishment that entails losing time from Torah study. A teacher should not ask students to inform him who among the other students committed a given act of mischief.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
May a Seller Charge a Higher Price if Payment is Delayed?
May a Lender Charge a Penalty for a Delayed Payment of the Debt?
Seizing a Debtor's Property in Lieu of Payment
Defining "Ri’bitt " (Interest)
"Ri’bit": The Prohibition Against Receiving or Paying Interest
Is It Permissible To Poach (Take Away) A Customer
The Halachic Propriety of Opening a Competing Business
Exceptions to the Rule Allowing a Neighbor the Right of First Refusal
Can a Neighbor Exercise His Right of First of Refusal if He Did Not Do So Immediately; a Business Partner's Right of First Refusal
Offering First Right of Refusal to a Partner or Neighbor
Damaging Somebody’s Property for the Purpose of Saving a Life
Is There a Liability When a Child Damages Somebody’s Property?
If One Damages Somebody’s Property In His Sleep, Under Intoxication, While Celebrating, or During a Sports Game
Liability for Damages Caused While Walking or Running in a Public Domain
The Extent of Liability for Property Damages
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found