DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 826 KB)
Some Laws Relevant to the Sandak at a Brit Milah

The term "Sandak" refers to the person given the honor of holding the baby during a Brit Milah. Serving as a Sandak is considered a great Mitzva, deemed equivalent to offering the Ketoret (incense) in the Beit Ha'mikdash. (Hida- Petah Enayim, Yoma 26A)

On the basis of this equation drawn between serving as Sandak and offering incense, the Rama (Rabbi Moshe Isserles, Poland, 1525-1572) writes in Yore Dea siman 265, based on a ruling of Rabbenu Peretz (one of the Tosafists, France, 13th century), that one should not serve as a Sandak for more than one child in the same family. The Gemara states that a Kohen who offered incense in the Temple was rewarded with wealth, and therefore, in order to allow as many Kohanim as possible to earn this reward, no Kohen would offer incense more than once in his lifetime. By extension, the Rama rules, a person should not serve as Sandak for two children of the same family, and should instead allow others the opportunity to earn the reward granted to those who perform this Mitzva.

The Gaon of Vilna (1720-1797), however, disagreed, and allowed serving as Sandak on multiple occasions even for children of one family. He argued that according to the rationale underlying the Rama's ruling, we should allow people to serve as Sandak only once in a lifetime, even for children of different families, and nowhere do we find such a practice mentioned or observed.

Rabbi Yehuda Ha'chasid (Germany, 1150-1217), in his "Sefer Chasidim," likewise writes that one should not serve as Sandak for more than one child within the same family. However, there is some question as to whether the laws presented in Sefer Ha'chasidim are universally binding. Some claim that Rabbi Yehuda Ha'chasid established these laws only for his own family, while others assert that they are binding only upon Ashkenazim. (Yichaave Daat, Helek 3, siman 77, page 261.)

In any event, as for the final Halacha, it is permissible to serve as Sandak many times, even for several children within the same family. (Soba Semahot, Helek 2, page 78)

There is a custom for the Sandak (and the Mohel) to immerse in a Mikveh before the circumcision. Since serving as Sandak has a siMilahr status to offering Ketoret, it should be performed in purity, just as is required for performing the service in the Beit Ha'mikdash. Additionally, the Mitzva of holding the baby during a circumcision serves as atonement for sins the Sandak may have committed involving his Brit Milah; for this reason, too, it is proper for him to immerse before the Milah, as part of the atonement process. (Soba Semahot, Helek 2, page 80)


If the Sandak and Mohel pray together in the same Minyan on the day of the circumcision, the Sandak takes precedence over the Mohel with regard to receiving an Aliya to the Torah. Thus, if only one Aliya is available, it is given to the Sandak rather than to the Mohel. (Rama, Yore Deah, siman 265:11)

Summary: It is a great Mitzva to serve as Sandak, meaning, to hold the baby during a Brit Milah. One may serve as Sandak several times even for children of the same family. It is proper for a Sandak to immerse in a Mikveh before the circumcision. The Sandak takes precedence over the Mohel in receiving an Aliya to the Torah on the day of the Brit Milah.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
May a Seller Charge a Higher Price if Payment is Delayed?
May a Lender Charge a Penalty for a Delayed Payment of the Debt?
Seizing a Debtor's Property in Lieu of Payment
Defining "Ri’bitt " (Interest)
"Ri’bit": The Prohibition Against Receiving or Paying Interest
Is It Permissible To Poach (Take Away) A Customer
The Halachic Propriety of Opening a Competing Business
Exceptions to the Rule Allowing a Neighbor the Right of First Refusal
Can a Neighbor Exercise His Right of First of Refusal if He Did Not Do So Immediately; a Business Partner's Right of First Refusal
Offering First Right of Refusal to a Partner or Neighbor
Damaging Somebody’s Property for the Purpose of Saving a Life
Is There a Liability When a Child Damages Somebody’s Property?
If One Damages Somebody’s Property In His Sleep, Under Intoxication, While Celebrating, or During a Sports Game
Liability for Damages Caused While Walking or Running in a Public Domain
The Extent of Liability for Property Damages
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found