DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 3.61 MB)
If One Mistakenly Recited “Morid Ha’tal” Instead of “Mashib Ha’ru’ah U’morid Ha’geshem”

During the winter months, we recite in the second blessing of the Amida prayer "Mashib Ha’ru’ah U’morid Ha’geshem" in place of "Morid Ha’tal," which is recited in the summer months. The Shulhan Aruch writes that if one mistakenly recited "Morid Ha’tal" in place of "Mashib Ha’ru’ah," he has nevertheless fulfilled his obligation, and does not need to repeat the Amida. If, however, one recited neither "Mashib Ha’ru’ah" nor "Morid Ha’tal," then he has not fulfilled his obligation and must therefore repeat the Amida.

The Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909), in Parashat Beshalah (Shana Rishona, 16), addresses the case of someone who realized immediately after completing the second blessing of the Amida – meaning, after he recited "Mehayeh Ha’metim" – that he mistakenly recited "Morid Ha’tal" instead of "Mashib Ha’ru’ah." If the person had not yet begun the next blessing ("Ata Kadosh"), the Ben Ish Hai writes, then he should recite "Mashib Ha’ru’ah" at that point, and then continue with "Ata Kadosh." In the view of the Ben Ish Hai, as long as one has not yet begun the next Beracha, he is still considered to be involved in the second Beracha, such that he can still recite "Mashib Ha’ru’ah."

Hacham Ovadia Yosef, however, both in Yabia Omer (1:22:13) and in Halichot Olam (Beshalah, 5), disputes this ruling. He contends that since mistakenly reciting "Morid Ha’tal" instead of "Mashib Ha’ru’ah" does not invalidate one’s recitation of the Amida, correcting this mistake does not justify making an interruption in between two blessings of the Amida. In a case where one made a mistake which would invalidate the Amida, Hacham Ovadia concedes, then one would, in fact, insert the required recitation in between two Berachot. And thus Hacham Ovadia writes that if one recited neither "Mashib Ha’ru’ah" nor "Morid Ha’tal" in the second blessing, such that he would have to repeat the Amida, then if he realized his mistake immediately after concluding "Mehayeh Ha’metim," before beginning "Ata Kadosh," he should recite "Mashib Ha’ru’ah" at that point. In this case, his Amida would otherwise be invalid, and so making an interruption in between the two Berachot to recite "Mashib Ha’ru’ah" is justified. If, however, one recited "Morid Ha’tal," then since this mistake does not invalidate the Amida, he should not interrupt in between two Berachot of the Amida to correct this mistake.

Summary: If, during the winter months, one mistakenly recited "Morid Ha’tal" instead of "Mashib Ha’ru’ah," then he does not need to repeat the Amida. If, however, one recited neither "Mashib Ha’ru’ah" nor "Morid Ha’tal," then he must repeat the Amida. If one mistakenly recited "Morid Ha’tal" instead of "Mashib Ha’ru’ah," and he realized his mistake immediately after reciting "Mehayeh Ha’metim," before beginning "Ata Kadosh," he should simply continue the Amida. If, however, one recited neither "Mashib Ha’ru’ah" nor "Morid Ha’tal," and he realized his mistake immediately after reciting "Mehayeh Ha’metim," then he should recite "Mashib Ha’ru’ah" at that point and then continue with "Ata Kadosh."

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
May a Seller Charge a Higher Price if Payment is Delayed?
May a Lender Charge a Penalty for a Delayed Payment of the Debt?
Seizing a Debtor's Property in Lieu of Payment
Defining "Ri’bitt " (Interest)
"Ri’bit": The Prohibition Against Receiving or Paying Interest
Is It Permissible To Poach (Take Away) A Customer
The Halachic Propriety of Opening a Competing Business
Exceptions to the Rule Allowing a Neighbor the Right of First Refusal
Can a Neighbor Exercise His Right of First of Refusal if He Did Not Do So Immediately; a Business Partner's Right of First Refusal
Offering First Right of Refusal to a Partner or Neighbor
Damaging Somebody’s Property for the Purpose of Saving a Life
Is There a Liability When a Child Damages Somebody’s Property?
If One Damages Somebody’s Property In His Sleep, Under Intoxication, While Celebrating, or During a Sports Game
Liability for Damages Caused While Walking or Running in a Public Domain
The Extent of Liability for Property Damages
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found