DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 3.77 MB)
If a Person Changes His Mind and Decides Not to Eat After Listening to a Beracha

Whenever one hears a Beracha, he must answer "Amen" to the Beracha – especially after one hears a Beracha for the purpose of fulfilling his obligation to recite it, for example, if two people want to drink water, and one recites the Beracha on behalf of them both. The one who listens to the Beracha should answer "Amen." However, if, for whatever reason, he did not answer "Amen," he has nevertheless fulfilled his obligation. As long as they both had in mind that the listener should fulfill his obligation through listening, he fulfills his requirement, even though he did not answer "Amen."

Interestingly, the Poskim draw an important distinction between one who answers "Amen" to a Beracha he hears to fulfill his obligation, and one who does not answer "Amen." If one does not answer "Amen," he fulfills his obligation, but he is not considered to have actually recited the text. By contrast, once a person answers "Amen" to a Beracha to which he had listened with the intention of fulfilling his obligation, he is considered to have personally recited the Beracha. He is not only credited with having recited a Beracha, but is regarded as having actually recited the words with his mouth.

The practical difference between the two cases, as Hacham Ovadia Yosef explains, relates to the possibility of changing one’s mind after fulfilling his obligation by listening to a Beracha. If one answered "Amen," then he is considered to have actually recited the Beracha, and so he does not have the option of changing his mind and not eating or drinking. If he does not eat or drink after reciting "Amen," then he is in violation of reciting a Beracha in vain, even though he did not actually recite the words of the Beracha with his mouth. But if he did not answer "Amen," then he is not considered to have personally recited the Beracha, and so although he has fulfilled his requirement if he still wishes to eat or drink, he has the option of changing his mind.

Summary: One should answer "Amen" after listening to a Beracha. If one listens to a Beracha with the intention of fulfilling his obligation to recite that Beracha, then after he answers "Amen" he is considered to have actually recited the Beracha, and therefore he must eat the food or drink the beverage, as otherwise, he will be considered to have recited a Beracha in vain. If, for whatever reason, he did not answer "Amen," he has nevertheless fulfilled his obligation and may eat the food or drink the beverage, but he is not considered to have actually recited the Beracha, and so he has the option to change his mind and not eat or drink.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
May a Seller Charge a Higher Price if Payment is Delayed?
May a Lender Charge a Penalty for a Delayed Payment of the Debt?
Seizing a Debtor's Property in Lieu of Payment
Defining "Ri’bitt " (Interest)
"Ri’bit": The Prohibition Against Receiving or Paying Interest
Is It Permissible To Poach (Take Away) A Customer
The Halachic Propriety of Opening a Competing Business
Exceptions to the Rule Allowing a Neighbor the Right of First Refusal
Can a Neighbor Exercise His Right of First of Refusal if He Did Not Do So Immediately; a Business Partner's Right of First Refusal
Offering First Right of Refusal to a Partner or Neighbor
Damaging Somebody’s Property for the Purpose of Saving a Life
Is There a Liability When a Child Damages Somebody’s Property?
If One Damages Somebody’s Property In His Sleep, Under Intoxication, While Celebrating, or During a Sports Game
Liability for Damages Caused While Walking or Running in a Public Domain
The Extent of Liability for Property Damages
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found