DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 4.47 MB)
The Prohibition Against Contradicting One’s Parent

The Shulhan Aruch, in discussing the laws of respecting parents (Yoreh De’a 240:2), mentions that it is forbidden to contradict one’s parent’s statement in the parent’s presence. If one’s parent expresses an opinion, it is forbidden to tell the parent that the opinion is wrong. In fact, one may not even support his parent’s viewpoint by saying, "I think he’s right," because it is disrespectful to indicate that the parent needs the child’s backing. Certainly, the child may not explicitly state that he thinks the other view is correct.

As for situations where the parent is not present, the Poskim instruct that one may express disagreement, but in an indirect or otherwise respectful manner. One example given is an instance where the Tur (Rabbenu Yaakov Ba’al Ha’turim, 1269-1343) disputes a Halachic ruling of his father, the Rosh (Rabbenu Asher Ben Yehiel, 1250-1327). But instead of explicitly stating that he did not accept his father’s position, the Tur instead cited the ruling of the Ba’al Ha’terumot (Rav Baruch Ben Yishak of Worms, 1140-1211) – which was the same ruling as the Rosh – and then disputed his ruling. This way, the Tur disputed his father indirectly, rather than explicitly saying that he disagreed with his father’s position. Likewise, in any circumstance where one disagrees with his father, he may express his disagreement when his father is not present, as long as he does so with the utmost respect and reverence.

The Pit’hei Teshuba, citing the Asmot Yosef (commentary to Masechet Kiddushin by Rabbi Yosef Ibn Ezra, Bulgaria, 1506-1589), notes that this Halacha does not apply to raising questions and posing challenges over the course of study. If a father and son are learning together, it is certainly permissible for the son to question what his father said as normally happens when two study partners learn together. This is part of the normal process of learning, and thus does not constitute an infringement upon the father’s honor.

Summary: One may not dispute his parent’s statement in his presence, and even when his parent is not present, disagreeing with something the parent said is allowed only if it is done respectfully. When a father and son learn together, however, it is permissible for the child to question and challenge what his father says as part of the usual learning process.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
The Beracha Over Puffed Wheat and Granola Bars
Situations When One Does Not Recite a Beracha Before Drinking Water
Does One Recite “Ha’mosi” over Sweet Bread, or over So-Called “Mezonot Rolls”?
What Beracha Does One Recite on Pita Chips?
Which Beracha Does One Recite Over Pizza or Calzone?
What Must the Third Person Eat for Three People to Make a Zimun?
Reciting a Zimun if a Third Person Arrives After the First Two Finished Eating
Making a Zimun in a Moving Vehicle, Boat or Plane
Zimun If Ten People Ate Together But Not All of Them Ate Bread
Insight Into the Text of the Zimun
Can Three People Make a Zimun if One of Them Did Not Eat Bread?
Can a Minor be Counted Toward a Zimun?
Zimun in a Yeshiva Cafeteria
The Beracha Recited Over Chocolate Bars with Nuts, and Over Coated Almonds
Berachot If One Falls Asleep During A Meal
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found