DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 4.47 MB)
Pidyon Ha’ben – If the Kohen Foregoes on the Money

The coins given by a father to a Kohen for the Misva of Pidyon Ha’ben must belong to the father. It goes without saying that a father cannot fulfill this Misva with money that was obtained unlawfully.

The father must actually give the coins to the Kohen. If the Kohen tells the father that he is "Mohel" – meaning, he foregoes on the money – then the Misva is not fulfilled. The father must give the Kohen the money. The Kohen may return the money to the father if he so wishes – and the Gemara relates that this was the practice of two great sages who were Kohanim – but the Misva is not fulfilled unless the Kohen actually receives the coins from the father.

As the Pidyon Ha’ben requirement constitutes a financial obligation, we apply to this requirement the famous rule of "Ha’mosi Me’habero Alav Ha’re’aya" – that the burden of proof falls upon the one seeking to extract money. This means that in a case where there is some uncertainty as to whether the obligation of Pidyon Ha’ben applies, the father is not required to pay money to a Kohen. Unless the Kohen can prove that the father owes the money, the father is not required to pay. One case would be if it is unknown whether the father himself is a Kohen, or if the mother is a Kohenet. If either parent is a Kohen or Kohenet, the obligation does not apply. Therefore, in a situation where it is unknown whether the father is a Kohen or the mother is a Kohenet, the father does not have to pay Pidyon Ha’ben until it can be proven that he is not a Kohen and the mother is not a Kohenet.

Summary: The money paid to a Kohen for Pidyon Ha’ben must legally belong to the father, and must actually be given to the Kohen; the Misva is not fulfilled if the Kohen says he foregoes on the payment. In a situation where there is some uncertainty as to whether the Pidyon Ha’ben obligation applies, the father is exempt until it can be ascertained that the Misva applies in that case.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
The Halachic Status of Non-Jewish Brandy, and of Wine Containing Other Ingredients
The Status of Wine Touched by a Non-Jewish Child; The Status of Products that May Have Been Mixed with Non-Jewish Wine
Setam Yenam – The Severity of the Prohibition Against Non-Jewish Wine
Setam Yenam – The Prohibition Against Drinking the Wine of Non-Jews
To What Temperature Must Wine be Heated to be Considered “Mebushal”?
The Status of Utensils Used by a Gentile for Cooking
Does the Prohibition of “Bishul Akum” Apply to Tuna Fish?
May One Eat Food Cooked by a Non-Jew if a Jew Kindled the Fire?
Eating Dairy at a Meat Meal Six Hours After Eating Meat; Starting a Dairy Meal Within Six Hours of Eating Meat
What is the Status of Parve Food Cooked in a Meat or Dairy Pot?
Converting Meat Utensils Into Dairy Utensils Through Hag’ala
May One Eat Fish with Milk or Other Dairy Products?
Kashrut of a Giraffe
Selling a Gid Ha'nashe to a Gentile, and Using it to Stitch the Parchment of a Sefer Torah
Washing One's Hands in Between Fish and Meat; Drinking Water Immediately After Eating Fish
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found