DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 4.36 MB)
Pidyon Ha’ben – Appointing an Agent; Performing the Pidyon Far Away From the Baby

Can a father fulfill the Misva of Pidyon Ha’ben – "redeeming" his firstborn son by paying money to a Kohen – by appointing somebody else to pay the money on his behalf? Many Misvot – such as Berit Mila – can be fulfilled through a Shali’ah (agent). Is this true of Pidyon Ha’ben, or must the father personally give the money to a Kohen?

The Rama (Rav Moshe Isserles of Cracow, 1530-1572), in Yoreh De’a (305:10), cites a responsum of the Ribash (Rav Yishak Bar Sheshet, 1326-1408) in which it appears (at least from the question posed to the Ribash) that the father must personally perform the Misva of Pidyon Ha’ben, and cannot appoint somebody else to fulfill the Misva on his behalf. According to this view, this Misva can be performed only by the father, or by the child himself when he grows older. (See Aruch Ha’shulhan for a lengthy discussion of the possible rationale underlying this position.)

Most other Poskim, however, disagree, and allow fulfilling the Misva of Pidyon Ha’ben via an appointed agent. These include the Shach (Rav Shabtai Hakohen, 1621-1662), the Taz (Rav David Ha’levi Segal, 1586-1667), and the Gaon of Vilna (1720-1797). According to the consensus opinion, then, it is acceptable to appoint somebody to perform the Pidyon Ha’ben on one’s behalf.

Therefore, if the father is ill or infirm, Heaven forbid, and is incapable of personally performing his son’s Pidyon Ha’ben, he may appoint somebody else to perform the Misva on his behalf.

If the father is not ill or infirm, but is away from home, such as if he is traveling on business when the time for his son’s Pidyon Ha’ben arrives, he can – and should – perform the Misva in his current location, rather than appoint a Shali’ah. Since the infant does not have to be present at the Pidyon Ha’ben, the father can simply pay the required sum of money to a Kohen wherever he is, and this is preferable to appointing an agent to perform the Pidyon Ha’ben on his behalf. This is the ruling of the Hatam Sofer (Rav Moshe Sofer of Pressburg, 1762-1839), in his published responsa (Y.D. 264-5), as cited in Pit’heh Teshuba (Y.D. 305:20).

Summary: If a father is incapable of performing a Pidyon Ha’ben for his son, such as if he is ill or otherwise incapacitated, he may appoint somebody to perform the Misva on his behalf. If he is traveling at the time when the Pidyon Ha’ben is to take place, he should pay the money to the Kohen at his current location, as the baby does not have to be present at his Pidyon Ha’ben.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
The Halachic Status of Non-Jewish Brandy, and of Wine Containing Other Ingredients
The Status of Wine Touched by a Non-Jewish Child; The Status of Products that May Have Been Mixed with Non-Jewish Wine
Setam Yenam – The Severity of the Prohibition Against Non-Jewish Wine
Setam Yenam – The Prohibition Against Drinking the Wine of Non-Jews
To What Temperature Must Wine be Heated to be Considered “Mebushal”?
The Status of Utensils Used by a Gentile for Cooking
Does the Prohibition of “Bishul Akum” Apply to Tuna Fish?
May One Eat Food Cooked by a Non-Jew if a Jew Kindled the Fire?
Eating Dairy at a Meat Meal Six Hours After Eating Meat; Starting a Dairy Meal Within Six Hours of Eating Meat
What is the Status of Parve Food Cooked in a Meat or Dairy Pot?
Converting Meat Utensils Into Dairy Utensils Through Hag’ala
May One Eat Fish with Milk or Other Dairy Products?
Kashrut of a Giraffe
Selling a Gid Ha'nashe to a Gentile, and Using it to Stitch the Parchment of a Sefer Torah
Washing One's Hands in Between Fish and Meat; Drinking Water Immediately After Eating Fish
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found