DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 5.45 MB)
Violating Shabbat to Care for a Woman After Childbirth

The Shulhan Aruch (Orah Haim 330:4) establishes that for three days after a woman delivers a baby, she is presumed to be in a potentially life-threatening condition, and thus caring for her overrides all the Shabbat prohibitions. This means that if the woman during this period needs food cooked, water heated, or a light turned on or off – this may all be done on her behalf, even if it is Shabbat. Even if the woman says she does not require this care, it is assumed that she is unaware of what her body needs after childbirth, and so everything which people deem necessary for her wellbeing may be done, even at the expense of the Shabbat prohibitions, without any hesitation.

The Mishna Berura (Rav Yisrael Meir Kagan of Radin, 1839-1933) brings two opinions as to how this three-day period is determined. According to one view, this period spans three Halachic days, as determined by sunrise and sunset. Thus, for example, if a woman delivered a baby before sundown on Wednesday, the three-day period consists only of the rest of the Wednesday, and then Thursday and Friday. On Shabbat, she would not be considered in a presumed condition of potential risk. However, the Mishna Berura then brings many other Halachic authorities (including the Ritva, the Eliyahu Rabba, the Issur Ve’heter, and the Bet Efrayim) who maintain that this period spans 72 hours. And therefore, if the delivery occurred before sundown on Wednesday afternoon, the three-day period continues until that time of day on Shabbat afternoon. Until that time, anything needed for the sake of caring for the woman may be done, even at the expense of the Shabbat prohibitions, and even if the woman says she does not need this care. This is the view accepted by Hacham Ovadia Yosef, in several contexts (Yabia Omer, vol. 7, Orah Haim 53; Leviyat Hen, 95; and Hazon Ovadia – Shabbat, vol. 3, p. 333).

After this 72-hour period, but within a week of childbirth, Shabbat may not be violated for needs which the woman says she does not require. Since the level of danger at this point is lower, one may not violate Shabbat for something which the woman says is not necessary. From the Shulhan Aruch’s formulation of this Halacha it appears that it applies only if the woman specifically says she does not need something done for her, but if she says nothing, then Shabbat may be violated. The Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909) ruled more stringently, and maintained that in between the third and seventh days after childbirth, Shabbat may be violated only for the sake of needs which the woman specifically requests. However, Hacham Ovadia, following the straightforward implication of the Shulhan Aruch, disagrees, and allows violating Shabbat during this period to care for the woman unless she specifically expresses that she does not require that form of care.

One example would be if the woman needs a nurse to help her use the restroom on Shabbat within a week after childbirth. In such a case, the Poskim allow the woman to press the button – though in an unusual manner – in order to call the nurse so she receives the help she needs.

Summary: During the first 72 hours after childbirth, anything deemed necessary for the woman’s wellbeing may be done, even if this requires desecrating Shabbat, due to the potential risk that exists. After 72 hours, until the end of seven days after childbirth, Shabbat is not violated to care for the woman in a manner which she says is unnecessary, but otherwise, Shabbat may be violated even during this period for the sake of caring for the woman.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
May a Seller Charge a Higher Price if Payment is Delayed?
May a Lender Charge a Penalty for a Delayed Payment of the Debt?
Seizing a Debtor's Property in Lieu of Payment
Defining "Ri’bitt " (Interest)
"Ri’bit": The Prohibition Against Receiving or Paying Interest
Is It Permissible To Poach (Take Away) A Customer
The Halachic Propriety of Opening a Competing Business
Exceptions to the Rule Allowing a Neighbor the Right of First Refusal
Can a Neighbor Exercise His Right of First of Refusal if He Did Not Do So Immediately; a Business Partner's Right of First Refusal
Offering First Right of Refusal to a Partner or Neighbor
Damaging Somebody’s Property for the Purpose of Saving a Life
Is There a Liability When a Child Damages Somebody’s Property?
If One Damages Somebody’s Property In His Sleep, Under Intoxication, While Celebrating, or During a Sports Game
Liability for Damages Caused While Walking or Running in a Public Domain
The Extent of Liability for Property Damages
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found