DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 1.28 MB)
If One Covered a Pot of Partially Cooked Food on the Blech

The Gemara derives from the Pasuk that Shabbat is Kodesh (sanctified), but Melacha (work) done in violation of Shabbat is not Kodesh and is not forbidden to benefit from. This is true on the level of D'Oraita (Torah law), but the Hachamim instituted a "K'nas" (penalty) to forbid benefit from prohibited actions done on Shabbat.

The severity of the penalty depends whether it was done B'Shogeg (unintentionally) or B'Mezid (intentionally). The Shulhan Aruch rules that Melacha done B'Shogeg is forbidden to everyone on Shabbat and is permitted immediately upon Mosa'eh Shabbat. If the Melacha was done B'Mezid, the violator is barred from ever benefiting from it, but others may benefit on Mosa'eh Shabbat.

One application of this Halacha was presented in a previous Daily Halacha, in a case where a woman removed a cover from a pot on the Blech and discovered that its contents were not cooked. If she returns the lid to the pot, she is in violation of the Melacha of Bishul (from the Torah), and therefore, the food is forbidden from benefit to everyone, even if she committed the violation unintentionally.

The question arises whether the Halacha would be the same in a case where the woman discovered the food was partially cooked-to the degree of Ma'achal Ben Drusai (one-third cooked), which is edible only in extreme circumstances. The Shulhan Aruch rules that even a food cooked to this degree is subject to further cooking, and clearly it was prohibited for her to return the cover. Nevertheless, the Mishna Berura (318:2) establishes a general principle that although the Halacha prohibits an action, whenever there is a legitimate disagreement between the Poskim, the lenient opinion can be relied on to permit the food, B'diavad-after the fact. In this case, there is the minority opinion of the Rashba that considers such a food fully cooked and not subject to the prohibition of further cooking. Even though the Halacha is not in accordance with the Rashba, he can be taken into account to permit eating the food after the woman returned the cover.

Hacham David in his Halacha Berura brings this principle. The classic application would be if a woman mistakenly reheated cold soup on the Blech. While clearly this is prohibited from the Torah, it does not render the soup forbidden, because of the minority opinion of the Rambam who holds that there is no prohibition to reheat cooked cold liquids.

SUMMARY

It is forbidden to benefit on Shabbat from even an unintentional violation of Shabbat, unless there is a legitimate, lenient minority opinion, which can be taken into account B'diavad-after the fact.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
Should One Pray Minha Ketana Without a Minyan Instead of Minha Gedola with a Minyan?
Halachot Concerning the "Mesader" Who Calls Congregants to the Torah
Is A Person Required To Stand During Chazara (Repetition of the Amidah)
Is One Required to Miss Work to Pray with a Minyan?
“Barechenu” and “Barech Alenu” Between 7 Marheshvan and the Beginning of December for Travelers to and From Israel
“Mesuve Ve’Ose” – The Unique Challenge of Accepting Obligation
One Who Realizes During the Amida That He is Facing the Wrong Direction; Facing Northeast or Southeast During the Amida
Does a Kohen Who Serves as Hazzan Recite Birkat Kohanim?
Facing the Kohanim During Birkat Kohanim
How Many Kaddishim are Recited When Three Sifreh Torah are Read in the Synagogue?
The Tefilah of ‘Hodu’ Before Baruch SheAmar
Arranging the Torah Scrolls on the Teba When Two or More Scrolls are Read
Idle Chatter During Pesukeh De’zimra
How To Make Up Missed Shacharit and Musaf in Minha of Shabbat
Reciting the Amidah With the Chazan When One Comes Late to the Synagogue; Other Situations Where One Recites Kedusha During the Silent Amidah
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found