DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 1.2 MB)
Must One Make Another Beracha When Changing Tefilin?

In the Halachot of Tefilin, there is a discussion whether one must make a new Beracha if he puts on a second pair of Tefilin. Take for example the following case. A person comes to Shul without his Tefilin, so he borrows a pair and makes a Beracha on them. During the Tefila, he finds his own Tefilin, which are more Mehudar, and wants to put them on instead. Does he have to make a new Beracha of "L’haniah Tefilin" or not?

Ostensibly, this should be a simple question. The Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909) already established in the Halachot of Sisit that if one wants to put on a different Tallit, he must make a new Beracha, even if he had specific intent to switch to the new Tallit when making the first Beracha. This ruling is accepted by Hacham Ovadia, and seemingly, the case of Tefilin should be no different. He should have to make a new Beracha.

However, the Zera Emmet distinguished between the case of Tefilin and the Tallit, and ruled that one should NOT make a new Beracha on the Tefilin. He argued that there is a fundamental difference in the nature of the obligation of these two Misvot. Technically, there is no obligation to wear a four-cornered garment. Rather, if one chooses to wear it, he must tie Sisit. Therefore, once a person takes off the first Tallit, he has finished the Misva, and there is no obligation to continue doing so. When he put on a second Tallit, it is new Misva and requires a new Beracha. On the other hand, there is an active commandment to wear Tefilin for as much of the day as possible; the Misva is continuous. Therefore, even after he removes the first pair, his obligation continues. The second pair of Tefilin are a natural continuation of the first pair and do not need a new Beracha.

Hacham Ovadia, in Yabia Omer vol. 3, brings down the opinion of the Zera Emmet, which implies that he agrees. Nevertheless, Hacham David in his responsa "Osrot Yosef," printed in the back of Halacha Berura on Tefilin, writes that he found a ruling of the Sefer HaEshkol (R. Avraham b. Yishak, 12th Century, France) regarding Hilchot Mezuza, from which he derives his opinion regarding Tefilin. The Sefer HaEshkol rules that if one removed a Mezuza in order to replace it with a more Mehudar Mezuza, he must make a new Beracha. Hacham David reasons that if this is true regarding Mezuza, which is a constant Misva that cannot be fulfilled by merely placing it one the doorpost once a day, certainly it is true regarding the Misva of Tefilin, which can be fulfilled fundamentally by putting them on once a day. Based on this, Hacham David rules that one must recite a new Beracha on the second pair of Tefilin. He argues that if Hacham Ovadia would have seen this ruling of the Sefer HaEshkol, he would have retracted his ruling in accordance with the Zera Emmet.

The Halacha is in accordance with Hacham David. Nevertheless, it is preferable to avoid entering this dilemma in the first place. One should create an interruption between donning the two pairs of Tefilin, by taking a walk outside.


SUMMARY:

If one put on a second pair of Tefilin or Tallit, he must recite a new Beracha, even if he had intent to switch when making the original Beracha.


 


Recent Daily Halachot...
May a Seller Charge a Higher Price if Payment is Delayed?
May a Lender Charge a Penalty for a Delayed Payment of the Debt?
Seizing a Debtor's Property in Lieu of Payment
Defining "Ri’bitt " (Interest)
"Ri’bit": The Prohibition Against Receiving or Paying Interest
Is It Permissible To Poach (Take Away) A Customer
The Halachic Propriety of Opening a Competing Business
Exceptions to the Rule Allowing a Neighbor the Right of First Refusal
Can a Neighbor Exercise His Right of First of Refusal if He Did Not Do So Immediately; a Business Partner's Right of First Refusal
Offering First Right of Refusal to a Partner or Neighbor
Damaging Somebody’s Property for the Purpose of Saving a Life
Is There a Liability When a Child Damages Somebody’s Property?
If One Damages Somebody’s Property In His Sleep, Under Intoxication, While Celebrating, or During a Sports Game
Liability for Damages Caused While Walking or Running in a Public Domain
The Extent of Liability for Property Damages
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found