DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Halacha is For The Hatzlacha of
 Frieda bat Sophia

Dedicated By
Her Family

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
      
(File size: 912 KB)
Is It Permissible To Be A Sandak Twice

The Rama (Rabbi Moshe Isserles, Poland, 1525-1572), in his glosses to the Yoreh De'a section of the Shulhan Aruch (Siman 265), cites from Rabenu Peres (France, 13th century) that one should not serve as Sandak on multiple occasions for one family. (The term "Sandak" refers to the person holding the infant during a circumcision.) The basis for this practice, the Rama explains, is the notion that the Misva of serving as Sandak is compared to the Misva of offering Ketoret, the incense in the Bet Ha'mikdash. The Sages teach that offering incense had the effect of making a person wealthy, and for this reason no Kohen would ever offer incense twice, so that all Kohanim would be granted the opportunity to earn wealth. Similarly, the Rama writes, it is proper not to serve as Sandak on multiple occasions, at least not within one family, so as not to deny others the opportunity for wealth provided by this great Misva.

The Gaon of Vilna (Rabbi Eliyahu of Vilna, 1720-1797), in his commentary to the Shulhan Aruch, disputes this ruling. He writes that were this practice to have stemmed from the comparison between serving as Sandak and offering incense, then it should require never serving as Sandak more than once in one's lifetime, even for different families. Just as a Kohen was not permitted to offer the incense more than once in his lifetime, in order to allow others to reap the benefits of this Misva, so would we have established that no person should serve as Sandak more than once. Since no such custom exists, the Gaon contended, we must conclude that it is not based upon the comparison between this Misva and the Ketoret.

The Gaon therefore claimed that this practice has its origins in the famous Last Will & Testament issued by Rabbi Yehuda Ha'hasid (Germany, 1150-1217), which includes numerous guidelines that the author advised his family to observe. It is unclear whether these rules were intended only for Rabbi Yehuda Ha'hasid's family, or for all Jews; in particular, it is questionable whether Sefaradim accepted these laws. Therefore, the Gaon of Vilna and many other authorities have ruled that one may, in fact, serve as Sandak on multiple occasions, even for children of different families. These authorities include the Noda Be'yehuda (Rabbi Yehezkel Landau of Prague, 1713-1793) and Rabbi Eliyahu Mani (Baghdad-Israel, 1824-1899). Although Rabbi Haim Palachi (Turkey, 1788-1869) held that one should not serve as Sandak twice within a period of twelve months, Hacham Ovadia Yosef disagrees. In his view, to the contrary, serving is Sandak is a great Misva that yields significant rewards, and one should therefore not abstain from serving as Sandak on multiple occasions, even within a short time-frame.

Summary: It is permissible for a person to serve as Sandak twice, or on multiple occasions, even for children of one family, and even within a short time-frame.

See Yalkut Yosef, Sova Semahot, Vol. 2, page 78

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
May a Seller Charge a Higher Price if Payment is Delayed?
May a Lender Charge a Penalty for a Delayed Payment of the Debt?
Seizing a Debtor's Property in Lieu of Payment
Defining "Ri’bitt " (Interest)
"Ri’bit": The Prohibition Against Receiving or Paying Interest
Is It Permissible To Poach (Take Away) A Customer
The Halachic Propriety of Opening a Competing Business
Exceptions to the Rule Allowing a Neighbor the Right of First Refusal
Can a Neighbor Exercise His Right of First of Refusal if He Did Not Do So Immediately; a Business Partner's Right of First Refusal
Offering First Right of Refusal to a Partner or Neighbor
Damaging Somebody’s Property for the Purpose of Saving a Life
Is There a Liability When a Child Damages Somebody’s Property?
If One Damages Somebody’s Property In His Sleep, Under Intoxication, While Celebrating, or During a Sports Game
Liability for Damages Caused While Walking or Running in a Public Domain
The Extent of Liability for Property Damages
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found