DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 1.07 MB)
The Text of Al Ha’mihya For Products Made From Grains Grown in Israel

When a person eats fruit from the special species (grapes, olives, dates, pomegranates and figs), he recites after eating the Beracha of "Al Ha’etz," and the text of the conclusion of the Beracha depends on where the fruit was grown. If the fruit was grown in Eretz Yisrael, then the concluding passage is "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Peroteha." If the fruit was grown outside Eretz Yisrael, then one recites the conclusion of "Al Ha’aretz Ve’a Ha’perot." (Of course, if one eats other fruits, such as apples or oranges, he recites "Boreh Nefashot.")

There is considerable discussion among the Halachic authorities as to whether such a distinction exists in the Beracha of "Al Ha’mihya" which one recites after eating grain products, such as cake or cookies. The Hida (Rav Haim Yosef David Azulai, 1724-1807) writes that as in the case with fruits, if one ate a product made from grains grown in Eretz Yisrael, he recites a special text for the conclusion of the Beracha. Namely, he recites, "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Mihyatah," instead of "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Ha’mihya." The Hida writes that this was the accepted custom. Others, however, disputed this ruling, noting that if this were the case, then in Birkat Ha’mazon, too, one who ate bread made from grain grown in Eretz Yisrael should recite the text of "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Mezonoteha" instead of "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Ha’mazon." The Hida responded to this challenge by noting that indeed, those Halachic authorities who require reciting "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Mihyatah" at the end of "Al Ha’mihya" also require reciting "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Mezonoteha" in Birkat Ha’mazon. But for whatever reason, the accepted custom was to make the change in "Al Ha’mihya" but not in Birkat Ha’mazon.

Hacham Ovadia Yosef ruled in accordance with the Hida’s position, that one who eats a product made from grain produced in Eretz Yisrael concludes his Beracha Aharona with the phrase, "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Mihyatah." In practice, however, this Halacha is very rarely applicable. The vast majority of grain used in food production in Israel is imported from other countries, and thus if one eats a product made in Israel, he must assume that the grain from which it was made was grown outside Eretz Yisrael. As such, even after eating foods produced in Israel one recites "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Ha’mihya" and not "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Mihyatah." One recites "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Mihyatah" only if he knows that the grain was grown in Israel. An example would be products made from Masa meal produced from Masa Shemura that was baked in Israel, or if one eats the Masa Shemura itself after Pesah, and thus recites "Al Ha’mihyatah" after eating. The grain used for Masa Shemura is guarded from the time it is harvested, so obviously the grain used by factories in Israel must be grown in Israel. Therefore, if one eats Masa Shemura products, he recites the concluding text of "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Mihyatah." Otherwise, however, one who eats grain products made in Israel recites the text of "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Ha’mihya."

These Halachot are discussed in Yalkut Yosef – Berchot, p. 205 (listen to audio recording for precise citation).

Summary: One who eats grain products made from grain grown in Eretz Yisrael recites the text of "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Mihyatah" as the conclusion of the Beracha Aharona, as opposed to the standard conclusion of "Al Ha’aretz Ve’al Ha’mihya." In practice, however, this Halacha rarely applies, since the vast majority of grain used in Israel is imported. This Halacha applies only with regard to products made from Masa Shemura produced in Israel, as the Masa is made with wheat grown in Israel.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
May a Seller Charge a Higher Price if Payment is Delayed?
May a Lender Charge a Penalty for a Delayed Payment of the Debt?
Seizing a Debtor's Property in Lieu of Payment
Defining "Ri’bitt " (Interest)
"Ri’bit": The Prohibition Against Receiving or Paying Interest
Is It Permissible To Poach (Take Away) A Customer
The Halachic Propriety of Opening a Competing Business
Exceptions to the Rule Allowing a Neighbor the Right of First Refusal
Can a Neighbor Exercise His Right of First of Refusal if He Did Not Do So Immediately; a Business Partner's Right of First Refusal
Offering First Right of Refusal to a Partner or Neighbor
Damaging Somebody’s Property for the Purpose of Saving a Life
Is There a Liability When a Child Damages Somebody’s Property?
If One Damages Somebody’s Property In His Sleep, Under Intoxication, While Celebrating, or During a Sports Game
Liability for Damages Caused While Walking or Running in a Public Domain
The Extent of Liability for Property Damages
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found