DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 756 KB)
Shinui Makom – If a Person Left During a Meal Eaten With Other People

In an earlier edition of Daily Halacha, it was mentioned that if a person was eating food that requires "Boreh Nefashot," such as fruit, and before reciting "Boreh Nefashot" he leaves, he must recite a new Beracha of "Ha’etz" when he resumes eating. The Rama (Rabbi Moshe Isserles of Cracow, 1525-1572), however, in Siman 178, qualifies this Halacha. He writes that if a person was eating with other people, and they remained behind when he left, then they establish a connection to the original location, such that he does not have to recite a new Beracha when he resumes eating. Maran does not follow this opinion, as in his view it is only regarding bread that Halacha distinguishes between one who was eating alone and one who was eating with other people. However, given the different opinions that exist, we apply the famous rule of "Safek Berachot Le’hakel" – we do not recite a Beracha in situations of Halachic uncertainty. And thus since the Rama does not require the recitation of a Beracha in this case when the person resumes eating, he should not recite a Beracha. This applies regardless of whom the person was eating with, even if they were members of his household, and even if they were women. This is the ruling of Hacham Ovadia Yosef, as cited in Yalkut Yosef (p. 84).

Thus, if several people were eating fruit together, and one leaves for a few moments and then returns, he does not have to recite a Beracha when he resumes eating.

However, this Halacha is subject to several conditions:

1) The people left behind have to have been eating, and not just sitting around the table. If they were not eating, then the person is considered to have been eating alone, and must therefore recite a new Beracha when he resumes eating.

2) The people must have not yet recited a Beracha Aharona. The Ma’amar Mordechai rules that if they already recited Beracha Aharona, this breaks the person’s connection to the original location, since the group has Halachically been dissolved, and he must recite a new Beracha when he returns.

3) The Shulhan Ha’tahor writes that the one who left must be aware of the fact that he left people behind eating. Otherwise, he does not maintain his connection to the original location.

4) The person must have left with the intention of returning.

If any of these conditions are not met, then the person is considered to have been eating alone, and must therefore recite a new Beracha when he resumes eating.

Summary: If a person was eating a food requiring "Boreh Nefashot" together with other people, and he leaves, he does not recite a new Beracha when he resumes eating, as long as: the other people were eating (and not just sitting there), they had not yet recited Beracha Aharona, the person who left knew they were remaining, and he left with the intention of returning.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
The Recitation of “Emet Ve’yasib” After the Morning Shema
Answering “Amen” to a Beracha After Completing “Hashkibenu” at Arbit
Does Minha Precede Musaf if One Did Not Recite Musaf Until the Afternoon?
Reciting the Verse “Yiheyu Le’rason” After the Amida
Laws of Kaddish
Halachot Relevant to Reciting the Verse “Hashem Melech”
Answering to Kadish, Barechu, Kedusha or Berachot During Baruch She’amar
May One Answer “Amen” During Pesukeh De’zimra?
If One is Praying the Amida When the Hazan Reaches Nakdishach
If One Mistakenly Recited Al Ha’mihya Instead of Birkat Ha’mazon
The Latest Time to Recite the Morning Amida, Baruch She’amar and Yishtabah
May a Kohen Interrupt Pesukeh De’zimra or Shema to Participate in Birkat Kohanim?
Upon Arriving Late To Minyan of Arbit
One Who Did Not Recite Minha the Day Before We Begin Reciting “Barech Alenu”
If One Mistakenly Recited “Barechenu” Instead of “Barech Alenu” on the Night of December 4th
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found