DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 1.13 MB)
Shinui Makom – If a Person Leaves His House During a Meal

The Shulhan Aruch (Orah Haim 178:1) rules that if a person was eating a meal with bread in his home, and in the middle he leaves and goes to another house, and no one is left behind at his table, this constitutes a "Hefsek" (interruption) in the meal. As such, when he returns he must recite Birkat Ha’mazon for what he already ate – assuming he ate at least a Ke’zayit of bread – and then recite a new Beracha of "Ha’mosi" before he resumes eating. This is the opinion accepted as normative Halacha by Hacham Bension Abba Shaul (Israel, 1923-1998), in his Or Le’siyon (1:17, and elsewhere), as well as Rabbi Moshe Halevi (Israel, 1961-2001), in his Birkat Hashem.

However, the Rama (Rabbi Moshe Isserles of Cracow, 1525-1572), reflecting the view of the Ashkenazim, disputes this ruling, and maintains that since the person was eating bread, he is still connected to his original location even after he leaves. As such, he may continue eating when he returns, without having to recite Birkat Ha’mazon or repeat "Ha’mosi." This applies even if he did not leave anybody behind at the meal, and he was eating alone. The Rama’s ruling is based on the position of Rav Hisda mentioned in the Gemara.

In light of this difference of opinion, Hacham Ovadia Yosef applies to this question the famous rule of "Safek Berachot Le’hakel" – that one does not recite a Beracha in situations of uncertainty. Accordingly, he rules that one should not recite Birkat Ha’mazon or repeat the Beracha of "Ha’mosi" in such a case. This ruling appears in Yalkut Yosef – Berachot (vol. 2, p. 78; listen to audio recording for precise citation), and in Hacham David Yosef’s Halacha Berura. Nevertheless, Hacham David adds that if one wishes to follow the view of the Shulhan Aruch and recite Birkat Ha’mazon and "Ha’mosi" before resuming his meal, he may do so. This is mentioned as well by Hacham Ovadia himself, in Halichot Olam (vol. 2, p. 40, in a footnote). But as for Hacham Ovadia’s actual position, he rules that one should resume his meal without reciting any Berachot, in light of the different views that exist regarding this issue.

Summary: If a person left his home in the middle of a meal that included bread, when he returns he continues eating without reciting Birkat Ha’mazon or any Berachot. This applies even if he was eating alone and did not leave anyone behind at the table when he left.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
The Recitation of “Emet Ve’yasib” After the Morning Shema
Answering “Amen” to a Beracha After Completing “Hashkibenu” at Arbit
Does Minha Precede Musaf if One Did Not Recite Musaf Until the Afternoon?
Reciting the Verse “Yiheyu Le’rason” After the Amida
Laws of Kaddish
Halachot Relevant to Reciting the Verse “Hashem Melech”
Answering to Kadish, Barechu, Kedusha or Berachot During Baruch She’amar
May One Answer “Amen” During Pesukeh De’zimra?
If One is Praying the Amida When the Hazan Reaches Nakdishach
If One Mistakenly Recited Al Ha’mihya Instead of Birkat Ha’mazon
The Latest Time to Recite the Morning Amida, Baruch She’amar and Yishtabah
May a Kohen Interrupt Pesukeh De’zimra or Shema to Participate in Birkat Kohanim?
Upon Arriving Late To Minyan of Arbit
One Who Did Not Recite Minha the Day Before We Begin Reciting “Barech Alenu”
If One Mistakenly Recited “Barechenu” Instead of “Barech Alenu” on the Night of December 4th
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found