DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Halacha is For Refuah Shelemah for
 Yosseffa Miriam bat Esther Shoshana

Dedicated By
Nissan Alon

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
      
(File size: 988 KB)
If A Blech Had Been Placed on a Stove Before Shabbat and Then Fell Off

The Gemara in Masechet Shabbat (37) discusses the case of a coal stove upon which one had poured ashes, extinguishing the flames, but the coals somehow were reignited. Ketima – pouring ashes over coals before Shabbat to extinguish them – allows one to keep food on the coals to serve on Shabbat (Shehiya), and to return cooked food to the coals on Shabbat to be warmed up (Hazara). The Gemara cites the ruling of Rav Safra, citing Rabbi Hiya, that one may leave food on the coals and return food to the coals even if the coals became rekindled after the ashes had been poured onto the coals. Once a person demonstrated that he has no interest in the fire, we are no longer concerned that he may stoke the coals, and it is thus permissible to leave food on the coals even if the coals became reignited.

Rav Moshe Feinstein (Russia-New York, 1895-1986), in his Iggerot Moshe (Orah Haim vol. 4, 74), addresses the question of whether this Halacha would apply to a Blech, the modern-day equivalent of Ketima. Placing a Blech over a stove allows one to leave food on the Blech before Shabbat to keep it warm for the Shabbat meal, and to return food to the Blech on Shabbat. If a Blech falls off the stove on Shabbat, would it be permissible to put a pot of food directly over the fire? Seemingly, just as a Blech functions as Ketima, which is effective even after its effects end and the coals are reignited, it should be permissible to place food on the fire even after the Blech falls off the stove.

Rav Moshe, however, distinguishes between the two cases. In the case of the ashes, even after the coals are rekindled, the original ashes remain on the stove, and thus there is a remnant of one’s initial action. This is quite different from the situation of a Blech that falls off a stove, in which case nothing remains of the action of placing the Blech on the fire. Therefore, even though in the Gemara’s case one may place food on the coals even after they are rekindled, one may not place food on the fire after the Blech falls off. However, Rav Moshe writes that if the Blech did not fall off completely, and some of it remains on the stove, then one may place food over the exposed flame, since, as in the case of Ketima, some remnant of one’s original action remains.

Summary: If one had placed a Blech over the burners on the stove to allow leaving food on the stove on Shabbat, and the Blech fell off the stove, one may not then place food over the exposed flame, unless the Blech had fallen off only partially.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
May A Seller Compensate For Partial Defect Or Must He Issue Full Refund?
Does A Purchaser Have The Right To Return A Defective Item
Damages Caused to a Car That is Blocking a Driveway or a Street
The Status of a Witness Who Received Money to Testify
Which Transgressions Render a Person Disqualified From Serving as a Witness?
Why are Women Disqualified From Serving as Witnesses?
May a Sinner Serve as a Witness If He Thought He Was Doing a Misva When He Sinned?
The Disqualification of “Shameless” People From Serving as Witnesses
Who is Disqualified From Serving as a Witness?
Watching a Lost Item Until it is Returned to its Owner
Who Keeps Money That is Found in a Private Backyard, or in a Store?
Returning and Claiming Lost Items
Hashabat Abeda – The Obligation to Return Lost Objects
Reading “Shenayim Mikra Ve’ehad Targum”
The Importance of Avoiding Anger
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found