DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Halacha is In Memory of
 Natan Mizrachi
"L’iluy nishmat Natan ben Shoshana Levy from your children"

Dedicated By
Your children

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
      
(File size: 660 KB)
If the Witnesses at a Wedding Ceremony Did Not Hear the Words, “Hareh At Mekudeshet Li”

It recently happened at a wedding that when the groom performed the Kiddushin – placing the ring on the bride’s finger – the microphone stopped working, and the witnesses thus did not hear the groom’s declaration of "Hareh At Mekudeshet Li Ba’Taba’at Zu Ke’dat Moshe Ve’Yisrael." Although they saw the groom place the ring on the bride’s finger, they did not hear him recite these words, proclaiming that he gives the ring for the purpose of betrothal. The question thus arose as to whether or not the Kiddushin was valid, as the witnesses did not hear the groom’s proclamation. Clearly, the witnesses should optimally be positioned close enough to the bride and groom so they could hear him speak, but the question arises as to whether the Kiddushin is valid after the fact if the witnesses could not hear the declaration of "Hareh At Mekudeshet Li…"

The answer emerges from a Halacha that applies in a case of "Asukim Be’oto Inyan" – where a man and woman are discussing their plans and arrangements for marriage, and in the middle of the conversation the man gives the woman a ring without saying anything. The Halacha in such a case is that the betrothal is effective even though the groom did not explicitly declare that he gave the ring for the purpose of Kiddushin. Since they were discussing their plans for marriage, it is evident that the groom gave the ring for the purpose of Kiddushin. Undoubtedly, this would apply under the Hupa, as well. If a groom is dressed in tuxedo, the bride is wearing a wedding gown, and they are standing under a canopy in a banquet hall filled with guests and relatives who received invitations to the affair, it is readily obvious that when the groom gives the bride a ring, he does so for the purpose of Kiddushin. This certainly qualifies as "Asukim Be’oto Inyan." As such, even if the witnesses did not hear the groom explicitly state that he gives the ring for the purpose of Kiddushin, the Kiddushin is valid since the witnesses saw the transfer of the ring and it is abundantly clear that it was done for this purpose.

Summary: The designated witnesses at a wedding should preferably stand close to the bride and groom when the groom places the ring on the bride’s finger so they can hear the groom declare, "Hareh At Mekudeshet Li…" However, if they did not hear this declaration, the Kiddushin is nevertheless valid, as long as they saw the groom place the ring on the bride’s finger.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
Does One Recite a Beracha Over a Secondary Food That Was Brought Only After He Recited the Beracha Over the Primary Food?
If One Eats the Secondary Food Before the Primary Food
The Beracha Over Cereal with Milk, and Yogurt with Fruit
If One Recited a Beracha Over a Cracker With Cheese, and Some Cheese Was Left Over
If a Person Changes His Mind and Decides Not to Eat After Listening to a Beracha
If a Person Mistakenly Concluded “Al Ha’mihya” With the Words “Al Ha’perot”
Fulfilling One’s Requirement by Listening to a Beracha Recited by Another Person
The Requirement of “Shem U’malchut” in a Beracha
Does the Beracha of “Gefen” Cover Other Beverages if One Does Not Intend to Drink More Wine?
Halachot Concerning the Berachot Over Wine, Fruit Juice and Coffee
Does One Recite a Beracha Over Beer or Whiskey Drunk During a Maal if HaMosi Was Recited?
Does One Recite a Beracha Over Tea and Coffee Drunk After a Meal If Ha'Mosi Was Recited ?
Must One Recite a Beracha Over Water or Wine During a Meal Where One Recited Ha'motzi?
Is Wine Still Considered A ‘Bore Peri HaGefen’ And Acceptable for Kiddush If It is Diluted
The Sequence of Berachot When Eating Cake With Coffee
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found