DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Halacha is In Memory of
 YONA CHAIM BEN MAZAL NASIMOV

Dedicated By
IRINA AND EDDIE KATANOV

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
      
(File size: 1.18 MB)
The Status of a Relative Through Marriage With Respect to Testimony

There is an important rule relevant to the Halacha of "Kerobim," the law disqualifying relatives from serving as co-witnesses or testifying about one another. The rule is that "Ba’al Ke’ishto Ve’isha Ke’ba’alah" – a husband is considered the same as his wife, and a wife is considered the same as her husband. Meaning, when we determine the nature of a familial relationship between two prospective witnesses, their wives’ relatives are considered their own relatives. Practically speaking, this means that two men could be disqualified from serving as witnesses together or testifying about one another even if they are not blood relatives, and are related only through marriage.

For example, as the Aruch Ha’shulhan (Rav Yechiel Michel Epstein of Nevarduk, 1829-1908) discusses in Hoshen Mishpat (33:4), a person cannot testify for or against his relative’s husband – such as his sister’s husband, or his first cousin’s husband. Even though the two men are related only through marriage, and are not blood relatives, the testimony is disqualified because a husband is considered a direct relative of his wife’s relatives. By the same token, one would be disqualified from testifying about his relative’s wife.

A more complicated application of this rule is a case of two men who are married to sisters. Each husband assumes the same status as his wife, and therefore these two men are regarded as "brothers" with respect to testimony. As such, they would not be allowed to serve as witnesses together, or to testify about one another, even though they are related only through their wives. This would be a case of "Rishon Be’rishon" – testifying with or about a direct family member – since the two men are considered "brothers."

Summary: Just as one cannot testify with or about a relative, one also cannot testify with or about a relative’s husband, or about a relative’s wife. Thus, for example, one cannot serve as a co-witness with his sister’s husband or his cousin’s husband, and may not testify for or against his cousin’s wife or his brother’s wife. Likewise, two men who are married to sisters cannot testify with each other or about one other.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
The Priceless Value of Serving as Sandak
The Connection Between Berit Mila and Speech
The Importance of the Berit Mila Meal and the Meal on the Friday Night Before the Berit
Which Kind of Kohen Should One Select for a Pidyon Ha’ben?
Pidyon Ha’ben – When is a Pidyon Required For a Firstborn Son?
Pidyon Ha’ben – May the Money be Given to a Kohenet?
The Pidyon Ha’ben Meal
If the Day of the Pidyon Ha’ben Falls on Shabbat, a Holiday, or a Fast Day
When Should a Pidyon Ha’ben be Performed for a Child Who Cannot Yet be Circumcised?
Using an Object of Value for Pidyon Ha’ben
Pidyon Ha’ben – If the Kohen Foregoes on the Money
May the Kohen Return the Money Received for a Pidyon Ha’ben?
Keeping One’s Word After Designating a Kohen for Pidyon Ha’ben
Pidyon Ha’ben – Appointing an Agent; Performing the Pidyon Far Away From the Baby
Naming a Baby at a Berit; the Permissibility of Naming an Ill Newborn Before the Berit
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found