DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Halacha is In Memory of
 YONA CHAIM BEN MAZAL NASIMOV

Dedicated By
IRINA AND EDDIE KATANOV

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
      
(File size: 1.18 MB)
The Status of a Relative Through Marriage With Respect to Testimony

There is an important rule relevant to the Halacha of "Kerobim," the law disqualifying relatives from serving as co-witnesses or testifying about one another. The rule is that "Ba’al Ke’ishto Ve’isha Ke’ba’alah" – a husband is considered the same as his wife, and a wife is considered the same as her husband. Meaning, when we determine the nature of a familial relationship between two prospective witnesses, their wives’ relatives are considered their own relatives. Practically speaking, this means that two men could be disqualified from serving as witnesses together or testifying about one another even if they are not blood relatives, and are related only through marriage.

For example, as the Aruch Ha’shulhan (Rav Yechiel Michel Epstein of Nevarduk, 1829-1908) discusses in Hoshen Mishpat (33:4), a person cannot testify for or against his relative’s husband – such as his sister’s husband, or his first cousin’s husband. Even though the two men are related only through marriage, and are not blood relatives, the testimony is disqualified because a husband is considered a direct relative of his wife’s relatives. By the same token, one would be disqualified from testifying about his relative’s wife.

A more complicated application of this rule is a case of two men who are married to sisters. Each husband assumes the same status as his wife, and therefore these two men are regarded as "brothers" with respect to testimony. As such, they would not be allowed to serve as witnesses together, or to testify about one another, even though they are related only through their wives. This would be a case of "Rishon Be’rishon" – testifying with or about a direct family member – since the two men are considered "brothers."

Summary: Just as one cannot testify with or about a relative, one also cannot testify with or about a relative’s husband, or about a relative’s wife. Thus, for example, one cannot serve as a co-witness with his sister’s husband or his cousin’s husband, and may not testify for or against his cousin’s wife or his brother’s wife. Likewise, two men who are married to sisters cannot testify with each other or about one other.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
Does One Recite a Beracha Over a Secondary Food That Was Brought Only After He Recited the Beracha Over the Primary Food?
If One Eats the Secondary Food Before the Primary Food
The Beracha Over Cereal with Milk, and Yogurt with Fruit
If One Recited a Beracha Over a Cracker With Cheese, and Some Cheese Was Left Over
If a Person Changes His Mind and Decides Not to Eat After Listening to a Beracha
If a Person Mistakenly Concluded “Al Ha’mihya” With the Words “Al Ha’perot”
Fulfilling One’s Requirement by Listening to a Beracha Recited by Another Person
The Requirement of “Shem U’malchut” in a Beracha
Does the Beracha of “Gefen” Cover Other Beverages if One Does Not Intend to Drink More Wine?
Halachot Concerning the Berachot Over Wine, Fruit Juice and Coffee
Does One Recite a Beracha Over Beer or Whiskey Drunk During a Maal if HaMosi Was Recited?
Does One Recite a Beracha Over Tea and Coffee Drunk After a Meal If Ha'Mosi Was Recited ?
Must One Recite a Beracha Over Water or Wine During a Meal Where One Recited Ha'motzi?
Is Wine Still Considered A ‘Bore Peri HaGefen’ And Acceptable for Kiddush If It is Diluted
The Sequence of Berachot When Eating Cake With Coffee
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found