DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 464 KB)
Damaging Somebody’s Property for the Purpose of Saving a Life

The Shulhan Aruch, in the Hoshen Mishpat section (380), rules that a person may intentionally cause damage to somebody else’s property if this is necessary to save his life. An example of such a situation is a person who is bleeding profusely and is at risk of dying from loss of blood. A person in this situation may tear somebody else’s garment to use it as a tourniquet if this is necessary to stop the bleeding. However, he is required to pay the garment’s owner for the loss of the garment.

Similarly, a third party is allowed to damage somebody’s property in order to save another person’s life. For example, a medic at the scene of an accident may, if necessary, tear a bystander’s garment to use a tourniquet to stop the patient’s bleeding. Strictly speaking, according to Torah law, the medic would then be required to compensate the garment’s owner for his loss. However, the Sages were concerned that if a third party would be held liable for damages in these cases, people would be hesitant or unwilling to step in to save other people’s lives, fearing the financial repercussions. The Sages therefore enacted a provision exempting a person from liability for damages he caused to save another individual’s life. Hence, even though a person must pay for damages he caused to save his own life, a medic who causes damage to save a patient’s life is not required to pay compensation.

Summary: One may damage somebody else’s property to save his life, but he must then pay for the damages. However, a medic who damages somebody’s property to save a patient’s life is not liable to pay for the damage.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
Must All Three People Have Eaten Bread in Order to Recite a Zimun?
The Obligation of Zimun Before Birkat Ha’mazon
The Abridged Birkat Ha’mazon – The Modern-Day Relevance of an Ancient Practice
Laws and Customs Relevant to the Final Portion of Birkat Ha’mazon
When is the Word “Magdil” in Birkat Ha’mazon Replaced With “Migdol”
If a Woman Realized After “Boneh Yerushalayim” at Se’uda Shelishit That She Had Omitted “Reseh”
Adding “Reseh” in Birkat Ha’mazon When Se’uda Shelishit Ends After Nightfall
If One Realized After “Boneh Yerushalayim” in Birkat Ha’mazon of Se’uda Shelishit That He Forgot “Reseh”
Reciting the Beracha Aharona As Soon as Possible After Drinking
If One Completed “Boreh Yerushalayim” in Birkat Ha’mazon and is Unsure Whether He Recited “Reseh”
If a Woman Forgot to Recite “Reseh” or “Ya’aleh Ve’yabo” in Birkat Ha’mazon
If One Forgot “Reseh” in Birkat Ha’mazon and Remembered After Reciting, “Baruch Ata Hashem”
If One Forgot to Recite “Reseh” Before “Ya’aleh Be’Yabo” in Birkat Ha’mazon
Should One Recite Birkat Ha’mazon if He is Inebriated?
Reciting Birkat Ha’mazon From a Written Text, in an Audible Voice, and With Concentration
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found