DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Halacha is In Memory of
 Aryeh Leib ben Moshe
"Dedicated today in Memory of Areyh Leib ben Moshe, zt'l, on the occassion of the first Yahrtzeit. He was a wondeful father and a dedicated husband."

Dedicated By
Mark Wiseman (son)

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
      
(File size: 842 KB)
Saying Kadish and Hazara If A Minyan Formed After Praying BeYachid

If a group of people assembled to pray but did not have a Minyan, and the tenth man arrived after they recited the Amida, may they recite the Hazara (repetition of the Amida) with Kedusha followed by Kaddish Titkabal? Although at this point they have a Minyan, they had already prayed the Amida without a Minyan, as individuals. The question thus arises as to whether a "Hazara" is warranted, given that the original Amida was recited as individuals, and not as part of a congregational service.

The Radbaz (Rabbi David Ben Zimra, 1480-1574) addresses this question in his work of responsa (240-241), where he rules that the group may not recite the "Hazara" in such a case. He explains that once they recited the Amida as individuals, without a Minyan, they lose the opportunity to recite the repetition of the Amida, Kedusha and Kaddish (listen to audio recording for precise citation). This is also the ruling of the Ben Ish Hai (Rabbi Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909), in his work Rav Pe’alim (vol. 2, 26).

The Shulhan Aruch, however, rules differently, and allows a group to recite the "Hazara" with Kedusha and followed by Kaddish, even if they recited the Amida before the Minyan surfaced (Orah Haim 69:1). This is the position accepted by the Hida (Rabbi Haim Yosef David Azulai, 1724-1806), in his work Mahazik Beracha, and by the Kaf Ha’haim (Rabbi Yaakob Haim Sofer, Baghdad-Israel, 1870-1939). The Kaf Ha’haim adds that we do not apply to this case the principle of "Safek Berachot Le’hakel" (meaning, we do not recite a Beracha if its requirement is in doubt), despite the debate surrounding the issue, because of the importance of the "Hazara." The Arizal (Rabbi Yishak Luria, Israel, 1534-1572) taught that the repetition bears as much importance as the initial recitation of the Amida, and the Kaf Ha’haim therefore maintained that the group should recite the "Hazara" in this case despite the controversy involved.

Hacham Ovadia Yosef likewise follows the view of the Shulhan Aruch, and holds that the "Hazara," Kedusha and Kaddish Titkabal should be recited in such a case. He adds that even if a single individual recited the Amida privately, and then nine men arrived who had already prayed, he may repeat the Amida and recite Kedusha and Kaddish Titkabal, since a Minyan has now assembled. Even though he recited the original Amida alone, now that a Minyan has arrived he may recite the "Hazara," Kedusha and Kaddish.

Summary: If a group assembles to pray but do not have a Minyan, but after they recited the Amida a Minyan arrives, they may recite the repetition of the Amida, Kedusha and Kaddish Titkabal. This applies even if a single individual prays privately and then nine people arrive; he may repeat the Amida and recite Kedusha and Kaddish now that a Minyan is present.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
Soaking One’s Feet in Hot Water on Shabbat to Induce Sweating
The Prohibition Against Using Water Heated by a Non-Jew on Shabbat
Moving Large, Heavy Furniture on Shabbat
Driving a Woman in Labor to and from the Hospital on Shabbat
May One Take a Time Released Capsule on Shabbat for Mosei Shabbat?
May One Feed his Animals on Shabbat?
May One Recite Kiddush if He Cannot Drink the Wine?
Taking a Flight That Takes Off Before Shabbat and Lands After Shabbat
The Benefits of Singing Songs on Shabbat
Is It Permitted to Discard the Waste While Eating
Are Colorful Bowl Cleansers Permissible on Shabbat?
Walking on Snow on Shabbat
Setting Timers ("Shabbat Clocks") Before Shabbat
Using a Doorknocker, Clapping, Banging and Whistling on Shabbat
Mixing Red Wine with White Wine on Shabbat - “Sobe’a,” or “Dyeing”
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found