DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 704 KB)
Shemitat Kesafim- Situations Where a Verbal Declaration Suffices in Lieu of a Prozbol (Prozbul)

A person who is owed money at the end of the Shemita (seventh, or "sabbatical") year may not collect these debts after the Shemita year unless he signs a Prozbol document before Rosh Hashanah. By signing this document, the individual declares that all debts owed to him are transferred to the authority of the Bet Din (Rabbinical court), and this allows him to collect the debts after Rosh Hashanah.

Generally speaking, Halacha requires signing the Prozbol document, and does not allow a person to merely announce the transfer of his debts to the Bet Din. It is insufficient for a person to make a verbal declaration to this effect, even if he does so in the presence of witnesses; he must sign the Prozbol document and thereby transfer his loans to the Bet Din.

Nevertheless, there is room for leniency in this regard under certain circumstances. Thus, for example, the Shulhan Aruch (Hoshen Mishpat 67:20) rules that Torah scholars are not required to write a Prozbol, and can instead simply declare in front of two witnesses that they transfer their loans to Bet Din. Furthermore, even laymen may make a verbal declaration in lieu of writing a Prozbol under extenuating circumstances. This would include a situation of one who wrote a Prozbol as required, but then lost the document at some point before Rosh Hashanah. Halacha does not require the individual to write a new Prozbol, and instead allows him to simply make a verbal declaration in the presence of two witnesses that he transfers his debts to Bet Din. Likewise, if a person arrives at the synagogue on Erev Rosh Hashanah, just before the onset of the holiday, and realizes that he had not written a Prozbol, it suffices for him to make a verbal declaration. He should approach two other people in the synagogue and declare in their presence that he transfers his loans to Bet Din, and this allows him to collect his debts after Rosh Hashanah, even though he did not write a Prozbol.

Summary: Generally speaking, one may not collect outstanding debts after the end of the Shemita year unless he had signed a Prozbol document before Rosh Hashanah. In certain situations, however, one may, instead of signing a Prozbol, verbally declare in the presence of two witnesses that he formally transfers his outstanding debts to Bet Din. This may be done by a Torah scholar, somebody who had signed a Prozbol but lost it before Rosh Hashanah, and somebody who realizes right before Rosh Hashanah that he had not written a Prozbol.

Visit www.iTorah.com to download the Prozbol form.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
Does One Recite a Beracha Over a Secondary Food That Was Brought Only After He Recited the Beracha Over the Primary Food?
If One Eats the Secondary Food Before the Primary Food
The Beracha Over Cereal with Milk, and Yogurt with Fruit
If One Recited a Beracha Over a Cracker With Cheese, and Some Cheese Was Left Over
If a Person Changes His Mind and Decides Not to Eat After Listening to a Beracha
If a Person Mistakenly Concluded “Al Ha’mihya” With the Words “Al Ha’perot”
Fulfilling One’s Requirement by Listening to a Beracha Recited by Another Person
The Requirement of “Shem U’malchut” in a Beracha
Does the Beracha of “Gefen” Cover Other Beverages if One Does Not Intend to Drink More Wine?
Halachot Concerning the Berachot Over Wine, Fruit Juice and Coffee
Does One Recite a Beracha Over Beer or Whiskey Drunk During a Maal if HaMosi Was Recited?
Does One Recite a Beracha Over Tea and Coffee Drunk After a Meal If Ha'Mosi Was Recited ?
Must One Recite a Beracha Over Water or Wine During a Meal Where One Recited Ha'motzi?
Is Wine Still Considered A ‘Bore Peri HaGefen’ And Acceptable for Kiddush If It is Diluted
The Sequence of Berachot When Eating Cake With Coffee
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found