DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 904 KB)
If a Person Mistakenly Recited Birkat Ha'mazon Instead of "Al Ha'miheya"

A person who partook of a Ke'zayit of grain products is required by Halacha to recite the Beracha of "Al Ha'miheya." If a person in such a case mistakenly recited Birkat Ha'mazon instead of "Al Ha'miheya," has he fulfilled his obligation through the recitation of Birkat Ha'mazon, or must he recite "Al Ha'miheya"?

While all Halachic authorities agree that Birkat Ha'mazon indeed covers grain products, they debate the precise parameters of this Halacha. The Shulhan Aruch (Orah Haim 208:17), based upon the position of Talmide Rabbenu Yona (the students of Rabbenu Yona of Gerona, Spain, 1180-1263), restricts this rule to grain products that have been baked, such as cake, cookies and the like. Only when one ate these kinds of foods does he fulfill his obligation even if he mistakenly recited Birkat Ha'mazon instead of "Al Ha'miheya." If, however, one partook of boiled grain foods, such as pasta, or fried grain foods, such as donuts, then he cannot fulfill his obligation through the recitation of Birkat Ha'mazon. Thus, if one mistakenly recited Birkat Ha'mazon after partaking of such foods, then, according to this view, he must recite "Al Ha'miheya."

Many other authorities, however, dispute this ruling and maintain that in all cases where one is required to recite "Al Ha'miheya," if he mistakenly recited Birkat Ha'mazon he has nevertheless fulfilled his obligation. These authorities include the Ritva (Rabbi Yom Yov of Seville, 1250-1330), the Elya Rabba (Rabbi Eliyahu Shapira of Prague, 1660-1712), the Hida (Rabbi Haim Yosef David Azulai, 1724-1806), the Kaf Ha'haim (Rabbi Yaakov Haim Sofer, 1870-1939), and the Mishna Berura (Rabbi Yisrael Meir Kagan, 1839-1933). This is, indeed, the ruling of Hacham Ovadia Yosef, in his work Hazon Ovadia (Laws of Tu Be'shvat, p. 183). Even though the Shulhan Aruch maintains that Birkat Ha'mazon does not cover boiled or fried products, Hacham Ovadia applies to this case the famous rule of "Safek Berachot Le'hakel" – that one does not recite a Beracha when there is some uncertainty as to whether it is warranted. Since the Halachic authorities debate the question of whether one must recite "Al Ha'miheya" if he mistakenly recited Birkat Ha'mazon after eating boiled or fried grain products, it is preferable not to recite "Al Ha'miheya" and to rely on the view that he fulfilled his obligation through Birkat Ha'mazon.

Incidentally, it should be noted that Halacha does recognize a distinction between baked grain products and boiled and fried products with respect to a case where one mistakenly recited "Ha'mosi" instead of "Mezonot" before eating. Hacham Ovadia rules that since boiled and fried grain products do not have the appearance of bread at all, they are not covered by the Beracha of "Ha'mosi." Therefore, if one mistakenly recited "Ha'mosi" instead of "Mezonot" over boiled or fried grain products, he must recite a new Beracha of "Mezonot." If this occurred before one partook of other grain products, however, then he has fulfilled his obligation through the recitation of "Ha'mosi" and does not recite a new Beracha.

Summary: If a person mistakenly recited Birkat Ha'mazon instead of "Al Ha'miheya," he has nevertheless fulfilled his obligation and does not need to then recite "Al Ha'miheya." If a person mistakenly recited "Ha'mosi" before eating a "Mezonot" food, then if the product was baked, such as cake, cookies and the like, then he has fulfilled his obligation and does not recite a new Beracha of "Mezonot." If the food was boiled – such as pasta – or fried – such as donuts – then he must recite a new Beracha of "Mezonot."

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
May a Seller Charge a Higher Price if Payment is Delayed?
May a Lender Charge a Penalty for a Delayed Payment of the Debt?
Seizing a Debtor's Property in Lieu of Payment
Defining "Ri’bitt " (Interest)
"Ri’bit": The Prohibition Against Receiving or Paying Interest
Is It Permissible To Poach (Take Away) A Customer
The Halachic Propriety of Opening a Competing Business
Exceptions to the Rule Allowing a Neighbor the Right of First Refusal
Can a Neighbor Exercise His Right of First of Refusal if He Did Not Do So Immediately; a Business Partner's Right of First Refusal
Offering First Right of Refusal to a Partner or Neighbor
Damaging Somebody’s Property for the Purpose of Saving a Life
Is There a Liability When a Child Damages Somebody’s Property?
If One Damages Somebody’s Property In His Sleep, Under Intoxication, While Celebrating, or During a Sports Game
Liability for Damages Caused While Walking or Running in a Public Domain
The Extent of Liability for Property Damages
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found