DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 484 KB)
If One Does Not Remember During the Amida Which Beracha He Just Recited

The question arose concerning an individual who did not concentrate properly during the recitation of the Amida, and after reciting the words "Bi'mhera Be'yamenu" he did not know which Beracha he had been reciting. These words appear towards the end of two Berachot in the Amida – the Beracha of "Laminim Ve'lamalshinim," and the Beracha of "Tishkon Be'toch Yerushalayim." If a person cannot remember which Beracha he was reciting when he came to the words "Bi'mhera Be'yamenu," from which point in the Amida should he continue? Should he begin from the end of "Laminim," or from the end of "Tishkon Be'toch Yerushalayim"?

Some authorities claimed that a person in this case should continue from the Beracha of "Tishkon Be'toch Yerushalayim," in light of the famous Halachic principle of "Safek Berachot Le'hakel." This principle establishes that in any situation where one is uncertain as to whether a given Beracha is required, he should not recite the Beracha. Accordingly, some argued, in the case described above one should resume his recitation from the later Beracha, that of "Tishkon Be'toch Yerushalayim," rather than risk reciting the interim Berachot – "Laminim" and "Al Ha'sadikim" – unnecessarily.

Hacham Ovadia Yosef, however, in his work Yabia Omer (vol. 9, p. 207), disagrees. He notes that to the contrary, the principle of "Safek Berachot Le'hakel" dictates that one should return to the Beracha of "Laminim" in this case. If one continues reciting the Amida from "Tishkon Be'toch Yerushalayim," then he runs the risk of reciting an incomplete Amida. According to Halacha, one who skips even a single Beracha of the Amida is considered as though he has recited the Amida at all, and thus all the Berachot he recited as part of the incomplete Amida have been recited in vain. Hence, the individual in the aforementioned case should return to "Laminim," such that at worst he recites only two Berachot unnecessarily, rather than risk reciting an invalid Amida.

Summary: If during the Amida a person recites the words "Bi'mhera Be'yamenu" and cannot remember whether he was reciting the Beracha of "Laminim" or that of "Tishkon," he should assume that he had been reciting "Laminim" and continue the Amida from that Beracha.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
May a Seller Charge a Higher Price if Payment is Delayed?
May a Lender Charge a Penalty for a Delayed Payment of the Debt?
Seizing a Debtor's Property in Lieu of Payment
Defining "Ri’bitt " (Interest)
"Ri’bit": The Prohibition Against Receiving or Paying Interest
Is It Permissible To Poach (Take Away) A Customer
The Halachic Propriety of Opening a Competing Business
Exceptions to the Rule Allowing a Neighbor the Right of First Refusal
Can a Neighbor Exercise His Right of First of Refusal if He Did Not Do So Immediately; a Business Partner's Right of First Refusal
Offering First Right of Refusal to a Partner or Neighbor
Damaging Somebody’s Property for the Purpose of Saving a Life
Is There a Liability When a Child Damages Somebody’s Property?
If One Damages Somebody’s Property In His Sleep, Under Intoxication, While Celebrating, or During a Sports Game
Liability for Damages Caused While Walking or Running in a Public Domain
The Extent of Liability for Property Damages
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found