DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 806 KB)
A Firstborn Son's Rights to a Double Portion in the Inheritance

The Torah establishes in the Book of Devarim (21:17) that a father must "recognize" ("Yakir") the distinction of his firstborn son by awarding him a double portion in the inheritance. Thus, for example, if a man had three sons, after his death his estate is divided into four portions, two of which are awarded to the firstborn; each of the other two sons then receives one of the remaining two portions. Interestingly enough, the Hebrew word "Bechor" ("firstborn") itself alludes to this Halacha. This word consists of the three letters "Bet," "Chaf" and "Resh," which have the respective numerical values of 2, 20 and 200 – all of which signify the notion of "double."

This Halacha applies only if the deceased's first child is male and born naturally (not cesarean.) If his oldest child is a daughter, then the oldest son does not have the status of "Bechor" and does not receive a double portion of the inheritance. Furthermore, this Halach only applies to the first born of the father, not the mother.

The right of the firstborn to a double portion does not apply if the father died, Heaven forbid, before the oldest son's birth. Meaning, if a woman conceived with twins and her husband passed away during pregnancy, the estate is divided evenly between the two twins. As mentioned earlier, the Torah presents the law of the firstborn's double portion with the word "Yakir," which means to "recognize" or "know." This term alludes to the fact that a firstborn receives a double portion only if his father "knew" him," to the exclusion of a tragic case of a firstborn whose father passed away before his birth.

If one's oldest child is a son but he was born after a miscarriage, he is nevertheless considered a "Bechor" with respect to this Halacha. Even though a firstborn son after a miscarriage does not require a Pidyon Ha'ben (the symbolic "redemption" of a firstborn son from a Kohen), he is deemed a Bechor as far as inheritance is concerned. A firstborn son thus receives a double portion even if he was born after a miscarriage or several miscarriages, and even if he was born after a stillborn child (or several stillborn children), Heaven forbid.

These Halachot apply only in cases where no will was written, and thus the deceased's estate is distributed automatically in accordance with the system prescribed in the Torah. We do not discuss here the issue of if and how one can circumvent these laws by drawing up a will during his lifetime.

Summary: When a father’s naturally (not caesarean) firstborn child is a son, he receives twice as large a share in his father's estate as his brothers. This applies even if the firstborn was born after a stillborn or miscarriage. It does not apply in a case of a man who dies while his wife was pregnant with twins; since he died before the birth of his firstborn son, the son does not receive a double portion.

See the book- "Pure Money" by Dayan Cohen, pages 222-223. See Hoshen Mishpat, siman 276.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
May a Seller Charge a Higher Price if Payment is Delayed?
May a Lender Charge a Penalty for a Delayed Payment of the Debt?
Seizing a Debtor's Property in Lieu of Payment
Defining "Ri’bitt " (Interest)
"Ri’bit": The Prohibition Against Receiving or Paying Interest
Is It Permissible To Poach (Take Away) A Customer
The Halachic Propriety of Opening a Competing Business
Exceptions to the Rule Allowing a Neighbor the Right of First Refusal
Can a Neighbor Exercise His Right of First of Refusal if He Did Not Do So Immediately; a Business Partner's Right of First Refusal
Offering First Right of Refusal to a Partner or Neighbor
Damaging Somebody’s Property for the Purpose of Saving a Life
Is There a Liability When a Child Damages Somebody’s Property?
If One Damages Somebody’s Property In His Sleep, Under Intoxication, While Celebrating, or During a Sports Game
Liability for Damages Caused While Walking or Running in a Public Domain
The Extent of Liability for Property Damages
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found