DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Halacha is For Refuah Shelemah for
 Rochel Etta bat Leah

Dedicated By
Sassoon Family

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
      
(File size: 656 KB)
Is The Middle-Man Retailer Responsible For Compensation If The Mfg Is Out Of Business, and Issues Regarding Counterfeit Bills

The question arose concerning a ring which somebody purchased from a retail jeweler and soon discovered that it was defective. He returned to the jeweler, showed him the defect in the ring, and demanded a full refund. The jeweler looked at the ring and acknowledged the defect, but he claimed that this is the responsibility of the manufacturer. Since he – the jeweler – did not make the ring, he claimed, he bears no responsibility and the customer must therefore bring his claim to the manufacturer. Is the jeweler's argument correct, or must he return the money to the customer?

The Shulhan Aruch addresses this case in the Hoshen Mishpat section (232:18), and rules explicitly that a middle-man bears full responsibility for the merchandise he sells. He is therefore legally required to refund the customer's money if the merchandise is found to be defective. Of course, the retailer can then make a legal claim against the manufacturer; with respect to the customer, however, he bears full responsibility and must refund his money.

If after a transaction is made the seller notices that some of the money he received from the buyer is counterfeit, may he approach the customer and demand that he pay that sum again with legal tender?

The Taz (commentary to the Shulhan Aruch by Rabbi David Halevi, 1586-1667) addresses this question in Hoshen Mishpat (end of 75) and rules that if the seller claims definitively that the counterfeit money was received from a certain buyer, then that buyer must pay the given sum. Even if the buyer himself in unsure as to whether he had paid the tender in question, if the seller makes a definitive claim then the buyer bears responsibility and must pay with proper currency the amount of counterfeit money that the seller had received.

Summary: If a buyer demands a full refund for defective merchandise purchased from a retailer, the retailer must refund the money; he may then make a claim against the manufacturer from which he had purchased the goods. If a seller received counterfeit money and claims to know definitely from which consumer he had received it, the consumer must pay the sum in question with proper, legal tender.

See the book- "Pure Money" by Dayan Cohen, pages 158-159.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
The Priceless Value of Serving as Sandak
The Connection Between Berit Mila and Speech
The Importance of the Berit Mila Meal and the Meal on the Friday Night Before the Berit
Which Kind of Kohen Should One Select for a Pidyon Ha’ben?
Pidyon Ha’ben – When is a Pidyon Required For a Firstborn Son?
Pidyon Ha’ben – May the Money be Given to a Kohenet?
The Pidyon Ha’ben Meal
If the Day of the Pidyon Ha’ben Falls on Shabbat, a Holiday, or a Fast Day
When Should a Pidyon Ha’ben be Performed for a Child Who Cannot Yet be Circumcised?
Using an Object of Value for Pidyon Ha’ben
Pidyon Ha’ben – If the Kohen Foregoes on the Money
May the Kohen Return the Money Received for a Pidyon Ha’ben?
Keeping One’s Word After Designating a Kohen for Pidyon Ha’ben
Pidyon Ha’ben – Appointing an Agent; Performing the Pidyon Far Away From the Baby
Naming a Baby at a Berit; the Permissibility of Naming an Ill Newborn Before the Berit
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found