DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Halacha is In Memory of
 Eliyahu Shimon Behar z"l
"may his memory be for a blessing"

Dedicated By
his loving grandchildren

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
      
(File size: 918 KB)
The Obligation of Repayment When One Does Not Know Who He Stole From

If a person stole an item without knowing to whom it belonged, and several people claim that it belonged to them, to whom must he return it?

Consider the example of a wedding guest who had to leave briefly, and before leaving he went into the coatroom and took somebody's umbrella, with the intention of returning it when he arrives back at the wedding. In the end he never made it back to the wedding, and so he hung signs in the area with his contact information in the hope that the umbrella's owner would come forth. If five people call him and claim that it was their umbrella, to whom must he return the umbrella?

The Shulhan Aruch rules (Hoshen Mishpat 365:1) that if each person advances his claim confidently and is prepared to swear that the stolen object had belonged to him, then the thief must compensate all of them. He must return the object to one person and pay the others its value.

This applies to stolen money, as well, such as if somebody leaves the office late and, realizing he has no cash, takes a $10 bill he sees on a coworker's desk. The next morning, several different people in the office claim that the bill might belong to them. The thief must give $10 to each one of them.

These laws underscore the gravity of theft and of borrowing items without permission, which is legally equivalent to theft. One must ensure never to take an item belonging to somebody else without receiving expressed permission from the owner.

(Based on Dayan Shelomo Cohen's work "Pure Money," vol. 1, pp. 44-46)

Summary: It is forbidden to borrow an object without receiving permission from the owner. If a person steals an object or borrows an object without permission (which is equivalent to theft), and several different people claim that the object had belonged to them and are prepared to substantiate their claim to this effect, he must compensate them all. He returns the object to one of them and pays the others the object's value.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
Does One Recite a Beracha Aharona if He Ate a “Ke’ayit” in Two Sittings?
If One is Uncertain Whether He Recited Birkat Ha’mazon
If One Intended to Recite One Beracha But Recited a Different One
If One Mistakenly Recited Birkat Ha’mazon Instead of Me’en Shalosh
Does the Beracha Over the Wine at Habdala Cover Wine Drunk During Melaveh Malka?
If a Person Eats a Ke’zayit of “Mezonot” Food and a Lesser Amount of Fruit
If One Ate a Food Requiring “Me’en Shalosh” With Fruits or Vegetables Requiring “Boreh Nefashot”
Changes in the Text of “Me’en Shalosh” When One Eats Products Grown in Israel
The Beracha Over Products Made From Corn Flour and Other Unconventional Types of Flour
Berachot Over Rice and Rice Products
Does “Boreh Nefashot” Cover Foods Requiring “Me’en Shalosh”?
The Proper Text for the Conclusion of “Al Ha’mihya”
The Beracha Aharona After Eating Mezonot and Drinking Wine
The Beracha for Stuffed Chicken, Stuffed Artichoke and Stuffed Avocado
Which Beracha Does One Recite on an Ice Cream Sandwich?
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found