DailyHalacha.com for Mobile Devices Now Available

Click Here to Sponsor Daily Halacha
"Delivered to Over 6000 Registered Recipients Each Day"

      
(File size: 822 KB)
The Obligations and Exemptions from Eating At A Seuda of A Brit Milah

The Shulchan Aruch (Yoreh De'a 265:12) records the custom to conduct a special meal on the day of a circumcision (listen to audio for precise citation).  The Rama (Rabbi Moshe Isserles, Cracow, Poland, 1530-1572), in his glosses to the Shulchan Aruch, adds that this meal has the status of a "Se'udat Mitzva" – a meal involving a Mitzva.  And one who does not participate in this meal, the Rama adds (based on the Gemara in Masechet Pesachim), is considered "excommunicated by the heavens."

 

The Shevet Ha'levi in Helek 8, SIman 217, (work of responsa by Rabbi Shemuel Wosner, a contemporary halachic authority in Bnei-Brak,) addresses the question of whether a Mohel, who, of course, attends many Beritot, must stay for the meal every time he performs a circumcision.  Very often a Mohel must rush to perform another Brit or to examine a baby for a Brit, and it is difficult for him to stay for the meal.  Is he, too, required to participate in the meal after every circumcision he performs?

 

The Shevet Ha'levi rules that somebody who must tend to another Mitzva is undoubtedly exempt from participating in this Se'udat Mitzva, and therefore a Mohel who has other circumcisions to tend to need not stay for the meal.  Furthermore, the Shevet Ha'levi writes that a person who has a regular Shiur (Torah class) or private study session at that time is likewise exempt from participating in the meal following a Brit.  This is also the ruling of Chacham Ovadia Yosef, in his work Yabia Omer, Helek 4, Siman 19.  Chacham Ovadia adds that if somebody cannot stay after a Brit for the meal because he must be somewhere else, he should take some food from the meal and eat it when he arrives.

 

It should also be mentioned that according to some Rabbis, the Halacha mentioned by the Rama, that one faces "excommunication" if he declines an invitation to participate in the meal after a Brit, does not apply nowadays.  The Aruch Ha'shulchan, ibid Seif 37,  (work of Halacha by Rabbi Yechiel Michel Epstein of Navarduk, Lithuania, 1829-1908), for example, writes that the obligation to take part in a Se'udat Mitzva stems from the opportunity these events present to be in the presence and company of Torah scholars.  Nowadays, however, many "improperly-behaved" people participate in these affairs, and therefore the "excommunication" does not obtain.  Others claim that once a Minyan is already present at the Se'udat Mitzva, one does not bear an obligation to participate.  Still others argued that invitations today are given purely for the purpose of etiquette, and do not actually impose an obligation upon a person to participate in the Se'udat Mitzva.

 

Therefore, although one should certainly endeavor to participate in the Se'udat Mitzva after a Brit, a person who must tend to a Mitzva or other pressing matters is allowed to leave without taking part in the meal.

 


Recent Daily Halachot...
The Scale of Misvot and Sins
The Four Categories of Atonement for Sins
Earning Atonement Through Repentance
Special Customs for the 25th of Elul (TODAY)
The Five Sins For Which it is Difficult to Repent
The Primary Components of Teshuva
Recommended Modes of Conduct as Part of the Teshuva Process
The Four Grievous Sins That Impede the Process of Teshuva
The Status of Informers and Those Who Impose Authority on the Community; Earning a Share in the World to Come Through Repentance
Forfeiting One's Share in the Next World by Leading Others to Sin, Isolating Oneself from the Jewish People, or Brazenly Transgressing the Torah
The "Apikorsim," "Kofrim" and "Minim" Who Have no Share in the Next World
Saying The Yag Midot in Selichot
Coming Closer To G-d from Rosh Chodesh Elul Until Yom Kippur
The Meaning of “Sabri Maranan”
Must the Person Who Leads Birkat Ha’mazon Drink the Wine?
Page of 239
3585 Halachot found